Deregulation - Sometimes the villain does the right thing
This Week in Tyranny - Episode 139
SOUNDPATH MUSIC FESTIVAL website - https://soundpath.org/
Konrad Rogoz:
Personal website - https://truthandlaw.com/
This Week in Tyranny show archive - https://onegreatworknetwork.com/konrad-rogoz
Email - This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
“President Donald Trump’s administration on Tuesday proposed revoking a scientific finding that has long been the central basis for U.S. action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change. The proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule would rescind a 2009 declaration that determined that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. The “endangerment finding” is the legal underpinning of a host of climate regulations under the Clean Air Act for motor vehicles, power plants and other pollution sources that are heating the planet. Repealing the finding “will be the largest deregulatory action in the history of America,” EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said Tuesday. The endangerment finding. Is and was, absolutely disgusting. But it was nothing new. It is the same argument as “national security, common good, vaccine morality” --National security – if you don’t support your government, then you're helping those terrorists out there --Common good – if you’re not with us, you’re against us. You must choose a side --Vaccine morality – if you don’t get a vaccine, you’re endangering the rest of society. They are all wrong, you are not causing harm to anyone else if you don’t vote, don’t support some social movement, or don’t get vaccinated. And it also does not cause harm to anyone to drive a big pickup truck that gets 6 miles a gallon. Yes combustion smoke is unhealthy. But so is a child falling when they are trying to walk or maybe climb a tree. You don’t put your child in a bubble, you expose them to some risk of harm in order for them to actually grow up and be independent. That is where we are in the hydrocarbon combustion engine paradigm. We will develop true clean energy. But it has to be through moral and economic justice. Meaning it’s not by government propaganda, private public partnerships, roundabout lobbying, or United Nations proclamations. It’ll be a free choice or it’s no choice at all. The EPA proposal must go though a lengthy review process, including public comment, before it is finalized, likely next year. Environmental groups are likely to challenge the rule change in court. The EPA also called for rescinding limits on tailpipe emissions that were designed to encourage automakers to build and sell more electric vehicles, So that’s why I’m pro-cash, pro- diesel engine, pro gas appliances, pro incandescent lightbulbs. Not because they’re the pinnacle of human achievement. But because forced progress isn’t real. It doesn’t exist. Life is voluntary. The moment someone does something against their will- they experience death. We’ve all experienced that, did something against our will- that’s death. And there may come a day where we take a breath for oxygen and we against our will inhale carbon and methane, and we may die. But if we succumb to forced “so-called” progress through immoral ideologies such as the endangerment finding- that will be certain death, long before the million simulated death projected by climate computer models And I say all of that after last episode I just talked about the polluted air. And just earlier this week was the epic wildfire smoke that coated Chicago. I guess I didn’t predict that either- dead clock is right twice a day right. I see the endangerment finding as separate from the overall air quality. Because I think air quality has less to do with the emissions from the ground and human activity, and has more to do with the emissions from the sky falling toward the ground. If you know what I mean, that’s geoengineering which Donald trump has not dared to touch by the way- quite the opposite. Because the military controls the skies and there has always been an intimate overlap between the skies and wireless communication. So there is an AI technocracy overlap. And stratospheric aerosol injection, and other reasons why particles remain suspended in the air as opposed to moving up into the atmosphere, separate conversations to have All that being said. The endangerment finding was wrong in principle, and rescinding it is right in principle. I know people get conflicted with some of the things that go on politically. There’s no reason to be conflicted. Just stick to your principles. And when you hear someone you trust say something absurd Or when you hear someone you know you can’t trust- say the truest thing you’ve ever heard. Take it easy, they’re not your god. Even the shadiest and most pathetic person on earth could have a heroic moment. It doesn’t mean they are your ally. They’re not your friend. And You’re the one you’re supposed to be trusting anyway